Fund-of-funds ETFs and multi-asset ETFs are designed to deliver diversified exposure by holding other funds or a combination of multiple asset classes within a single portfolio. While the terminology varies, the underlying purpose is consistent: reduce the need for investors to build complex portfolios by offering a bundled solution that spreads risk across various instruments. These ETFs aim to simplify asset allocation and portfolio construction, often using pre-set weights that align with investor goals, risk tolerance, or time horizon.
A fund-of-funds ETF holds other ETFs or mutual funds as its underlying securities. Rather than investing in stocks or bonds directly, it invests in a curated selection of existing funds, each targeting specific asset classes or sectors. A multi-asset ETF, on the other hand, may directly hold a mix of equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, or alternative investments within a single fund structure, or it may blend this with a fund-of-funds approach. These categories overlap, but the distinction lies in how the underlying exposures are obtained—either through direct holdings or through investment in other funds.
These ETFs are commonly used in retirement planning, target-date strategies, robo-advisor platforms, and core-satellite portfolio models. They offer convenience, but that convenience comes with structural implications—some beneficial, some limiting—that need to be understood before allocating capital.
Purpose and Use in Portfolio Construction
The primary appeal of fund-of-funds and multi-asset ETFs is consolidation. Investors who would otherwise need to buy multiple funds, rebalance across asset classes, and monitor correlations can instead hold one product that encapsulates an entire allocation strategy. These ETFs are marketed as all-in-one solutions, targeting outcomes like growth, income, preservation of capital, or balanced exposure across traditional asset classes. They often operate with predefined allocation models—such as 60% stocks and 40% bonds—or dynamically shift weightings based on market signals or glidepath frameworks.
In target-date structures, the fund adjusts its asset mix gradually over time, becoming more conservative as the investor approaches retirement. This strategy is rule-based and typically involves rebalancing from equities into fixed income and cash equivalents. In other designs, such as risk-based portfolios, the allocations remain fixed but vary by product based on intended investor profile—conservative, moderate, or aggressive.
Multi-asset ETFs are also used by advisors and institutional allocators looking to implement model portfolios efficiently. Rather than assembling dozens of tickers or managing cash flows across accounts, a single ticker simplifies execution and tracking. For platforms and 401(k) plans, these funds reduce complexity and administrative burden while providing participants with turnkey exposure to global markets.
Composition and Holdings
Fund-of-funds ETFs usually invest in other ETFs offered by the same provider. A typical structure includes allocations to equity ETFs (domestic, international, emerging markets), fixed income ETFs (short-, intermediate-, or long-term bonds), and sometimes commodities or real assets. The chosen ETFs are often broad-market, low-cost, and passively managed to minimize tracking error and fees within the aggregate structure. However, some funds mix in actively managed ETFs or alternative exposures for tactical tilts.
Multi-asset ETFs may hold securities directly or through an internal basket approach. These portfolios might include U.S. stocks, developed international equities, corporate bonds, sovereign debt, REITs, preferred shares, convertible bonds, and even gold or commodity-linked notes. Some funds use derivatives to gain exposure or hedge risks, introducing an additional layer of complexity. Portfolio design can be static, semi-active, or fully discretionary depending on whether the fund follows a mechanical rule set or relies on active management teams.
For investors, the result is a single fund that reflects a broad and often globally diversified investment approach. But the simplicity at the surface does not mean simplicity underneath. Asset correlations, sector concentrations, currency exposure, and credit quality still exist within the holdings, just hidden one layer removed.
Fees and Cost Structure
One issue with fund-of-funds ETFs is the potential for layered fees. Because the ETF holds other funds, each underlying ETF has its own expense ratio, which is passed through to the top-level fund. The fund-of-funds ETF may then add an additional management fee on top of that. While providers have reduced internal costs over time and often waive or absorb fees for proprietary ETFs held within the structure, the aggregate expense ratio can still be higher than a single-asset ETF.
Multi-asset ETFs that hold securities directly avoid this problem but may have higher headline fees due to increased trading costs, operational complexity, and management overhead. Actively managed multi-asset ETFs are especially prone to cost creep, particularly when portfolio turnover is high or when exposure is obtained through synthetic means like futures or swaps.
Investors need to examine the prospectus to identify whether the quoted expense ratio includes all underlying fees or if it reflects only the top-layer charge. The total cost of ownership—taking into account bid-ask spreads, taxes, and tracking performance—can vary considerably between providers.
Liquidity and Market Behavior
Most fund-of-funds and multi-asset ETFs trade with moderate liquidity. Because they are often intended for long-term holdings or model-based strategies, their volume may not be as high as single-sector or thematic ETFs. However, the liquidity of the ETF itself is less important than the liquidity of its underlying holdings. If the underlying funds or securities are highly liquid, the ETF can accommodate large trades with minimal market impact, assuming an efficient creation/redemption process.
During times of market stress, these ETFs behave based on the liquidity of the underlying asset classes. A fund with significant high-yield bond exposure may exhibit pricing dislocation in volatile markets, while one holding large-cap equities and Treasuries may remain stable. Investors often overestimate how liquid or stable these products are based on ticker-level behavior alone, without reviewing what’s inside.
Also, because rebalancing is baked into the fund’s mandate, volatility can trigger internal adjustments that create friction, particularly in multi-asset strategies using active or tactical overlays. These funds can become net sellers of rising assets and buyers of falling ones during sharp market moves, affecting returns.
Tax Considerations
In taxable accounts, fund-of-funds and multi-asset ETFs offer the same basic tax efficiency of other ETFs, provided they use in-kind creation and redemption processes. However, the tax characteristics of the underlying holdings still matter. For example, if the fund owns dividend-paying international equity ETFs, it may pass on foreign tax withholding. If it holds high-turnover bond ETFs, it may generate short-term capital gains.
The presence of foreign securities, commodities, or derivatives can complicate the tax picture further. Funds holding commodity-linked notes or futures may generate K-1s or introduce non-qualified income. Investors holding these funds in IRAs or other tax-advantaged accounts avoid most of the issues, but in taxable portfolios, the structure and composition should be reviewed with tax treatment in mind.
Some providers offer tax-managed multi-asset ETFs that seek to harvest losses or defer gains, though these tend to be more actively managed and carry higher fees.
Performance and Benchmarking
Performance in these ETFs depends on the underlying asset mix and how well the allocations align with market conditions. A static 60/40 stock-bond fund will perform differently from a dynamically managed global multi-asset ETF with currency overlays and alternative exposures. Comparing funds across providers or strategies is difficult without understanding the asset class weights, regional exposure, and use of active vs. passive components.
Some funds benchmark themselves against traditional models (e.g., Morningstar Moderate Allocation Index), while others use absolute return targets or custom internal benchmarks. This can obscure performance comparisons and make it harder to determine whether returns come from smart allocation, favorable conditions, or excessive risk-taking.
Performance also depends heavily on rebalancing discipline. Funds that rebalance quarterly or annually may behave differently from those that adjust dynamically. In rising equity markets, rebalancing may drag performance by selling winners too early. In falling markets, it may cushion drawdowns by trimming risky assets. The mechanics are simple, but the timing and implementation details matter.
Limitations and Misconceptions
These funds are often marketed as “one-stop” solutions, but that doesn’t make them comprehensive. Most stick to traditional asset classes and exclude more esoteric investments like private equity, direct real estate, or inflation-linked instruments. Risk is still present, though diffused, and the illusion of diversification can lead investors to underestimate volatility.
There’s also the risk of overlap. If an investor holds a fund-of-funds ETF as well as individual ETFs in a portfolio, they may be duplicating exposure unintentionally. Many fund-of-funds products include large-cap U.S. equity ETFs, so adding a separate allocation to those funds elsewhere can overweight positions.
Behavioral risk is another concern. Because these funds are marketed as set-and-forget products, investors may assume they will always perform smoothly. When a diversified ETF posts negative returns due to market-wide drawdowns, investors often abandon it at precisely the wrong time. The simplicity of the vehicle doesn’t protect against poor timing or emotional decision-making.
Final Thoughts on Fund-of-Funds and Multi-Asset ETFs
Fund-of-funds and multi-asset ETFs provide structural efficiency, simplified execution, and diversified exposure in a single product. They are designed for hands-off implementation, appealing to retirement savers, model-driven advisors, and investors seeking ease over precision. When constructed well, they serve their purpose. But they are not immune to market forces, structural constraints, or investor error.
Choosing one of these ETFs is less about chasing alpha and more about defining what outcomes the investor wants—stability, income, risk mitigation, or simplicity—and aligning that with the fund’s internal structure and strategy. Over time, the advantage lies not in outperformance, but in behavioral discipline and the elimination of complexity.
To explore other ETF types and investment strategies, visit our index page or return to our mainpage at https://www.xitmuseum.com.